Open Science & Altmetrics Monthly Roundup (May 2014)

Don’t have time to stay on top of the most important Open Science and Altmetrics news? We’ve gathered the very best of the month in this post. Read on!

GitHub & co. continue working to incentivize open science software

This month, collaborative coding site GitHub updated the public on their work with Figshare, Zenodo, and Mozilla Science to create citable code for academic software. Now, you can make any GitHub repository more citable–and accessible over time–by minting a DOI for it.

Researchers at the SciForge project responded to the announcement with a list of “10 non-trivial things GitHub & friends can do for science.” In their post, they pointed out that minting DOIs for software code is just the tip of the iceberg. Other challenges include reconciling GitHub’s commercial interests with what’s best for the scientific community, maintaining metadata quality for metadata submitted to DOI registries via Figshare and Zenodo, and optimizing how DOIs are issued for software that has multiple versions.

Of course, not everyone uses GitHub to manage their research software to begin with. If you’re a GitHub beginner, check out Carly Strasser’s “GitHub: a primer for researchers” and the GitHub guide to getting started.

Originator of Open Notebook Science, Jean-Claude Bradley, Dies

Chemist and Open Science advocate Jean-Claude Bradley passed away this month. Bradley is most famous for coining the term Open Notebook Science, which he used to describe his practice of “making all your research freely available to the public, and in real time”. His lab did its work this way for years. The Open Science community has lost a giant. Jean-Claude will be greatly missed.

How many scholarly documents are on the Web?

According to research published this month in PLOS ONE, “the [lower bound] number of scholarly documents, published in English, available on the web is roughly 114 million.”

Why is this important? Well, with the large number of scholarly documents on the web, we can text- and data-mine at scale–so long as these documents are all Open Access. But as @openscience pointed out on Twitter, 3 in 4 scholarly documents on the Web aren’t Open Access–which brings us to our next news item.

Are most researchers Open Access poseurs?

A recent publisher survey of Canadian authors found that while 83% agreed that Open Access to scholarship is important, less than 10% of authors considered OA when deciding where to publish. And a recently tweeted JASIST article from 2013 shows that only around 36% of European authors are taking advantage of publishers’ permissions to post OA copies of otherwise paywalled scholarship.

Why the disconnect between beliefs and practice? It’s not clear from these sources, but we hope that the numbers continue to increase over time, so we end up in a fully Open Access future.

Other recent altmetrics news

  • PeerJ makes peer-reviews more citable: the publisher now issues DOIs for open peer-reviews of its articles, making it possible to cite peer reviews using a permanent identifier. In doing so, peer-review contributions will remain accessible over time, even as URLs change, and reviewers will now be able to more easily track citations to their reviews (thereby incentivizing open peer-review).

  • Altmetrics-themed workshop at SSP 2014 Meeting: some of the area’s brightest minds–including Euan Adie (Altmetric.com) and William Gunn (Mendeley.com)–participated yesterday in the “21st Century Research Assessment” panel at this year’s Society for Scholarly Publishing annual meeting. As you might expect, the event was highly tweeted: check out the #sspboston hashtag on Twitter to witness the debate.

  • Australian and New Zealander librarians sought for altmetrics survey: a team of researchers seeks participants for a survey on support for altmetrics at Australian and New Zealand academic libraries. Respond to the survey on SurveyMonkey before it closes on June 7, 2014.

  • Impactstory launches notification emails, Advisors program: Now, you no longer have to visit impactstory.org to find out when your research has received new citations, downloads, or tweets. Instead, we’ll send you an email alert. We’re really excited about this new feature and also about another big launch that happened this month: our Advisors program!

    Impactstory users have been asking us for months how they can help spread the word. So, in addition to launching a Spread the Word resources page, we’ve started an Advisors program, so motivated advocates can better host Impactstory workshops, help us understand their needs, and advocate for altmetrics at their institution.  To learn more–and apply!–visit our website.

Upcoming events you can’t miss

Two great events are happening in June: the Altmetrics14 workshop in Bloomington, Indiana and the Special Library Association 2014 Annual Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia. Heather will appear on an altmetrics panel and at the closing session of SLA ‘14, and Stacy will be in attendance at Altmetrics14. We hope to see you at both events! But if you can’t make ‘em, follow along on Twitter at #sla2014 and #altmetrics14.

Stay connected

We share altmetrics and Open Science news as-it-happens on our Twitter, Google+, Facebook, or LinkedIn pages. And if you don’t want to miss next month’s news roundup, remember that you can sign up to get these posts and other Impactstory news delivered straight to your inbox.

The ultimate guide to staying up-to-date on your articles’ impact

You published a paper–congrats!  Has anyone read it?  Cited it?  Talked about it on Twitter?  How can you find out–as it happens?

Automated alerts!  Email updates that matter come right to you.

We’ve compiled a two-part primer on the services that deliver essential research impact metrics straight to your inbox, so you can stay up to date without having to do a lot of work.

In this post, we’ll share tips for how to automagically track citations, altmetrics and downloads for your publications; in our next post, we’ll share strategies for tracking similar metrics for your data, code, slides, and social media outreach.

Citations

Let’s start with citations: the “coin of the realm” to track scholarly impact. You can get citation alerts in two main ways: from Google Scholar or from traditional citation indices.

Google Scholar Citations alerts

Google Scholar citations track any citations to your work that occur on the scholarly web. These citations can appear in any type of scholarly document (white papers, slide decks, and of course journal articles are all fair game) and in documents of any language. Naturally, this means that your citation count on Google Scholar may be larger than on other citation services.

To get Google Scholar alerts, first sign up for a Google Scholar Citations account and add all the documents you want to track citations for. Then, visit your profile page and click the blue “Follow” button at the top of your profile. You’ll see a drop-down like this:

Screenshot of a Google Scholar profile, showing the blue

Enter your preferred email address in the box that appears, then click “Create alert.” You’ll now get an alert anytime you’ve received a citation.

Citation alerts via Scopus & Web of Knowledge

Traditional citation indices like Scopus and Web of Knowledge are another good way to get citation alerts delivered to your inbox. These services are more selective in scope, so you’ll be notified only when your work is cited by vetted, peer-reviewed publications. However, they only track citations for select journal articles and book chapters–a far cry from the diverse citations that are available from Google Scholar. Another drawback: you have to have subscription access to set alerts.

Web of Knowledge

Web of Knowledge offers article-level citation alerts. To create an alert, you first have to register with Web of Knowledge by clicking the “Sign In” button at the top right of the screen, then selecting “Register”.

5sBUo1G.png

Then, set your preferred database to the Web of Science Core Collection (alerts cannot be set up across all databases at once). To do that, click the orange arrow next to “All Databases” to the right of “Search” in the top-left corner. You’ll get a drop-down list of databases, from which you should select “Web of Science Core Collection.”

Now you’re ready to create an alert. On the Basic Search screen, search for your article by its title. Click on the appropriate title to get to the article page. In the upper right hand corner of the record, you’ll find the Citation Network box. Click “Create citation alert.” Let Web of Knowledge know your preferred email address, then save your alert.

Scopus

In Scopus, you can set up alerts for both articles and authors. To create an alert for an article, search for it and then and click on the title in your search results. Once you’re on the Article Abstract screen, you will see a list of papers that cite your article on the right-hand side. To set your alert, click “Set alert” under “Inform me when this document is cited in Scopus.”

To set an author-level alert, click the Author Search tab on the Scopus homepage and run a search for your name. If multiple results are returned, check the author affiliation and subjects listed to find your correct author profile. Next, click on your author profile link. On your author details page, follow the “Get citation alerts” link, and list your saved alert, set an email address, and select your preferred frequency of alerts. Once you’re finished, save your alert.

With alerts set for all three of these services, you’ll now be notified when your work is cited in virtually any publication in the world! But citations only capture a very specific form of scholarly impact. How do we learn about other uses of your articles?

Tracking article pageviews & downloads

How many people are reading your work? While you can’t be certain that article pageviews and full-text downloads mean people are reading your articles,  many scientists still find these measures to be a good proxy. A number of services can send you this information via email notifications for content hosted on their sites. Impactstory can send you pageview and download information for some content hosted elsewhere.

Publisher notifications

Publishers like PeerJ and Frontiers send notification emails as a service to their authors.

If you’re a PeerJ author, you should receive notification emails by default once your article is published. But if you want to check if your notifications are enabled, sign into PeerJ.com, and click your name in the upper right hand corner. Select “Settings.” Choose “Notification Settings” on the left nav bar, and then select the “Summary” tab. You can then choose to receive daily or weekly summary emails for articles you’re following.

In Frontiers journals, it works like this: once logged in, click the arrow next to your name on the upper left-hand side and select “Settings.” On the left-hand nav bar, choose “Messages,” and under the “Other emails” section, check the box next to “Frontiers monthly impact digest.”

Both publishers aggregate activity for all of the publications you’ve published with them, so no need to worry about multiple emails crowding your inbox at once.

Not a PeerJ or Frontiers author? Contact your publisher to find out if they offer notifications for metrics related to articles you’ve published. If they do, let us know by leaving a comment below, and we’ll update this guide!

ResearchGate & Academia.edu

bhr3lLZ.png

Some places where you upload free-to-read versions of your papers, like ResearchGate and Academia.edu, will report how many people have viewed your paper on their site.

You can turn on email notifications for pageviews, downloads, comments, bookmarks, and citations by other papers on ResearchGate by visiting “Settings” (on both sites, click the triangle in the upper right-hand corner of your screen). Then, click on the “Notifications” tab in the sidebar menu, and check off the types of emails you want to receive. On Academia.edu, the option to receive new metrics notifications for pageviews, downloads, and bookmarks are under “Analytics” and “Papers”; on Researchgate, it’s under “Your publications” and “Scheduled updates”.

PLOS article metrics via Impactstory

Impactstory now offers alerts, so you’re notified any time your articles get new metrics, including pageviews and downloads. However, we currently only offer these metrics for articles published in PLOS journals. (If you’d like to see us add similar notifications for other publishers, submit an idea to our Feedback site!) We describe how to get Impactstory notifications for the articles that matter to you in the Social Media section below.

Post-publication peer review

Some articles garner comments as a form of post-publication peer review. PeerJ authors are notified any time their articles get a comment, and any work that’s uploaded to ResearchGate can be commented upon, too. Reviews can also be tracked via Altmetric.com alerts.

PeerJ

To make sure you’re notified with you receive new PeerJ comments, login to PeerJ and go to “Settings” > “Notification Settings”  and then click on the “Email” tab. There, check the box next to “Someone posts feedback on an article I wrote.”

ResearchGate

To set your ResearchGate notifications, login to the site and navigate to “Settings” > “Notifications.” Check the boxes next to “One of my publications is rated, bookmarked or commented on” and “Someone reviews my publication”.

Altmetric.com

Post-publication peer reviews from Publons and PubPeer are included in Altmetric.com notification emails, and will be included in Impactstory emails in the near future. Instructions for signing up for Altmetric and Impactstory notifications can be found below.

PubChase

Article recommendation platform PubChase can also be used to set up notifications for PubPeer comments and reviews that your articles receive. To set it up, first add your articles to your PubChase library (either by searching and adding papers one-by-one, or by syncing PubChase with your Mendeley account). Then, hover over the Account icon in the upper-right hand corner, and select “My Account.” Click “Email Settings” on the left-hand navigation bar, and then check the box next to “PubPeer comments” to get your alerts.

Social media metrics

What are other researchers saying about your articles around the water cooler? It used to be that we couldn’t track these informal conversations, but now we’re able to listen in using social media sites like Twitter and on blogs. Here’s how.

Social media metrics via Altmetric.com

Altmetric.com allows you to track altmetrics and receive notifications for any article that you have published, no matter the publisher.

S00Rpwu.png

First, install the Altmetric.com browser bookmarklet (visit this page and drag the “Altmetric It!” button into your browser menu bar). Then, find your article on the publisher’s website and click the “Altmetric it!” button. The altmetrics for your article will appear in the upper right-hand side of your browser window, in a pop-up box similar to the one at right.

Next, follow the “Click for more details” link in the Altmetric pop-up. You’ll be taken to a drill-down view of the metrics. At the bottom left-hand corner of the page, you can sign up to receive notifications whenever someone mentions your article online.

The only drawback of these notification emails is that you have to sign up to track each of your articles individually, which can cause inbox mayhem if you are tracking many publications.

Social media metrics via Impactstory

9GtkvJ6.png

Here at Impactstory, we recently launched similar notification emails. Our emails differ in that they alert you to new social media metrics, bookmarks, and citations for all of your articles, aggregated into a single report.

To get started, create an Impactstory profile and connect your profile to ORCID, Google Scholar, and other third-party services. This will allow you to auto-import your articles. If a few of your articles are missing, you can add them one by one by clicking the “Import stuff” icon, clicking the “Import individual products” link on the next page, and then providing links and DOIs. Once your profile is set up, you’ll start to receive your notification emails once every 1-2 weeks.

When you get your first email, take a look at your “cards”. Each card highlights something unique about your new metrics for that week or month: if you’re in a top percentile related to other papers published that year or if your PLOS paper has topped 1000 views or gotten new Mendeley readers. You’ll get a card for each type of new metric one of your articles receives.

Note that Impactstory notification emails also contain alerts for metrics that your other types of outputs–including data, code and slide decks–receive, but we’ll cover that in more detail in our next post.

Now you’ve got more time for the things that matter

No more wasting your days scouring 10+ websites for evidence of your articles’ impact; it’s now delivered to your inbox, as new impacts accumulate.

Do you have more types of research outputs, beyond journal articles? In our next post, we’ll tell you how to set up similar notifications to track the impact of your data, software, and more.

Updates:
12/17/2014: 
Updates to describe the revamped Impactstory interface and new notification options for ResearchGate and Academia.edu
5/27/2014: Added information about PubChase notification emails.

Do you have what it takes to be an Impactstory Advisor?

Help us spread the word! (Photo licensed CC-BY-SA by Vacant Fever)

Help us spread the word!
(Photo licensed CC-BY-SA by Vacant Fever)

You’ve been asking for an opportunity to help spread the word about Impactstory. Here it is.

We’re recruiting a select group of researchers and librarians to become Impactstory Advisors!

Our advisors will:

  • Invite friends and colleagues to try out Impactstory

  • Give us feedback on features and report bugs

  • Host brown bag lunches and presentations on Impactstory at their school or library

  • Spread the word locally by hanging up our (soon to be released) cool new posters

  • Connect Impactstory to the rest of your online life–link to your profile from your Twitter bio, Facebook page, lab website, and anywhere else you can!

In return, we’ll foot the pizza bill for Impactstory workshops, give our Advisors access to Impactstory Premium (details coming soon!), send awesome swag, and share hot off the press news on planned features and other company developments.

The best benefit of all? Our community of like-minded, cutting edge Advisors will get the satisfaction of knowing they’re helping to change research evaluation for the better.

Think you have what it takes? Apply to be an Impactstory Advisor today!

Open Science & Altmetrics Monthly Roundup (April 2014)

Don’t have time to stay on top of the most important Open Science and Altmetrics news? We’ve gathered the very best of the month in this post. Read on!

Funding agencies denying payments to scientists in violation of Open Access mandates

Want to actually get paid from those grants you won? If you haven’t made publications about your grant-funded research Open Access, it’s possible you could be in violation of funders’ public access mandates–and may lose funding because of it.

Richard Van Noorden of Nature News reports,

The London-based Wellcome Trust says that it has withheld grant payments on 63 occasions in the past year because papers resulting from the funding were not open access. And the NIH…says that it has delayed some continuing grant awards since July 2013 because of non-compliance with open-access policies, although the agency does not know the exact numbers.

Post-enforcement, compliance rates increased 14% at the Wellcome Trust and 7% and the NIH. However, they’re still both a ways from seeing full compliance with the mandates.

And that’s not the only shakeup happening in the UK: the higher ed funding bodies warned researchers that any article or conference paper accepted after April 1, 2016 that doesn’t comply with their Open Access policy can’t be used for the UK Research Excellence Framework, by which universities’ worthiness to receive funding is determined.

That means institutions now have a big incentive to make sure their researchers are following the rules–if their researchers are found out of compliance, the institutions’ funding will be in jeopardy.

Post-publication peer review getting a lot of comments

Post-publication peer review via social media was the topic of Dr. Zen Faulkes’ “The Vaccuum Shouts Back” editorial, published in Neuron earlier this month. In it, he points out:

Postpublication peer review can’t do the entire job of filtering the scientific literature right now; it’s too far from being a standard practice….[it’s] an extraordinarily valuable addition to, not a substitute for, the familiar peer review process that journals use before publication. My model is one of continuous evaluation: “filter, publish, and keep filtering.”

So what does that filtering look like? Comments on journal and funder websites, publisher-hosted social networks, and post-pub peer review websites, to start with. But Faulkes argues that “none of these efforts to formalize and centralize postpublication peer review have come close to the effectiveness of social media.” To learn why, check out his article on Neuron’s website.

New evidence supports Faulkes’ claim that post-publication peer review via social media can be very effective. A study by Paul S. Brookes, published this month in PeerJ, found post-publication peer review using blogs makes corrections to the literature an astounding eight times as likely to happen than corrections reported to journal editors in the traditional (private) manner.

For more on post-publication peer review, check out this classic Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience special issue, Tim Gower’s influential blog post, “How might we get to a new model of mathematical publishing?,” or Faculty of 1000 Prime, the highly respected post-pub peer review platform.

Recent altmetrics-related studies of interest

  • Scholarly blog mentions relate to later citations: A recent study published in JASIST (green OA version here) found that mentions of articles on scholarly blogs correlate to later citations.

  • What disciplines have the highest presence of altmetrics? Hint: it’s not the ones you think. Turns out, a higher percentage of humanities and social science articles have altmetrics than for those in the biomedical and life sciences. Researchers also found that only 7% of all papers found in Web of Science had Altmetric.com data.

  • Video abstracts lead to more readers: For articles in the New Journal of Physics, video abstract views correlate to increased article usage counts, according to a study published this month in the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication.

New data sources available for Impactstory & Altmetric.com

New data sources include post-publication peer review sites Publons and PubPeer, and microblogging site Weibo Sina (the “Chinese Twitter”). Since we get data from Altmetric, that means Impactstory will be reporting this data soon, too!

And another highly-demanded data source will be opening up in the near future: Zotero. The Sloan Foundation has backed research and development for the open source reference management software that will eventually help Zotero build “a preliminary public API that returns anonymous readership counts when fed universal identifiers (e.g. ISBN, DOI).” So, some day soon, we’ll be able to report Zotero readership information alongside Mendeley stats in your profile–a feature that many of you have been asking us about for a long time.

Altmetric.com offering new badges

Altmetric.com founder Euan Adie announced that for those who want to de-emphasize numeric scores on content, the famous “donut” badges will now be available sans Altmetric score–a move heralded by many in the altmetrics research community as being a good move away from “one score to rule them all.”

Must-read blog posts about ORCID and megajournals

We’ve been on a tear publishing about innovations in Open Science and altmetrics on the Impactstory blog. Here are two of our most popular posts for the month:

Stay connected

Do you blog on altmetrics or Open Science and want to share your posts with us? Let us know on our Twitter, Google+, Facebook, or LinkedIn pages. We might just feature your work in next month’s roundup!

And if you don’t want to miss next month’s news, remember that you can sign up to get these posts and other Impactstory news delivered straight to your inbox.

“Share your impact story” contest winner announced!

Last week, we asked you to share how Impactstory has helped your career. Today, we’re announcing the contest winner: Dr. Emilio Bruna!

Dr. Emilio Bruna, our contest winnerEmilio is a Professor with the Department of Wildlife Ecology & Conservation at the University of Florida and an Open Science advocate. Here’s his impact story:

I included Impactstory data in my portfolios for 1) promotion to full professor and  2) selection to UF’s Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars,  a campus-wide faculty award.  Both were successful.  

But perhaps more importantly, I included Impactstory in my workshop on scientific publishing for graduate students, where in one of the sessions all the participants set up ORCID IDs, Researcher IDs, and Impactstory Profiles – check it out. Students get it.

Emilio’s story echoes many others we’ve heard since founding Impactstory: you’re using our service to uncover all the ways in which your research makes an impact, and you’re using that data when going up for tenure & promotion, applying for grants and awards, and teaching the next generation of scientists what it means to be an influential scholar.

For having the best story, Emilio wins an Impactstory t-shirt of his choice. Congrats, Emilio!

And thanks to all of our contest participants!

How to become an academic networking pro on LinkedIn

You now have a solid LinkedIn profile, but you don’t quite know what to do with it.

After all, it’s difficult for scientists to self-promote. To many, it just feels unnatural. Plus, your contacts are out of date, and LinkedIn functionalities like Endorsements seem to be not quite right you as an academic.

Given that, how exactly are you supposed to use LinkedIn appropriately to connect with other scientists and find job opportunities?

You’re in luck. On top of the tips we compiled for our last post, we’ve found the best strategies for using LinkedIn to network in academia.

In this post, we’ll tell you the keys to networking for academics on LinkedIn: how to find and sustain a professional relationship with colleagues and experts in your field, get others to Endorse and Recommend you in the right ways, and connect LinkedIn to the rest of your professional life.

1. Get connected to your existing web of co-workers and advisors

Lu6DG0z.png

It’s surprisingly easy to find people you already know and add them to your network on LinkedIn.

Use the Add Connections tab in the top right corner of your profile to connect LinkedIn to your email account.

LinkedIn then suggests Connections based on your contacts. A rule to follow for LinkedIn, as opposed to Twitter and Facebook, is that you should only select Connections you actually know and feel comfortable asking to keep in touch (former collaborators, co-workers, and friends are good choices).

When Connecting, it’s a nice touch to send a message saying hello. Networking is all about building meaningful relationships, not how many people you have in your virtual Rolodex.

2. Request introductions to new contacts

If you want a good way to meet potential collaborators or get an “in” for a job, Connecting with strangers can be useful.

But how do you get around the awkwardness of asking strangers to Connect? The answer: ask a current contact for an introduction.

Here’s an example of how that would work: I’m not currently Connected to genomics researcher Mike Eisen on LinkedIn, but let’s say I want to collaborate with him to do some research on a great idea I have.

H7IeBkj.png

The first thing I need to do to connect with him is find a contact that we have in common. So, I visit Mike’s profile. On the left-hand side is a “How You’re Connected” graphic. I can scroll through the list of contacts we have in common to find a suitable middleman–Mendeley’s William Gunn.

Next, I would click on the “Ask William about Mike” link. In the dialog box that appears, I’d write my request for an introduction and send it to William. The request should follow three key rules:

Be specific

William might take 10 minutes out of his day to write a recommendation for me, so I shouldn’t waste his time. That means telling him exactly why I want to meet Mike: what Mike does that interests me (he’s a genomics researcher), and what I’m looking to get out of an introduction (an opportunity to tell him about my great research idea: widgets for genomics researchers).

Include a “pitch” as to why an introduction would be valuable

Likewise, I should make it clear what Mike would get out of meeting me. What do I bring to the table? In this case, it’d be the chance to learn about a well-received new widget, and a future NSF grant opportunity.

Show appreciation, and also provide William with an “easy out”

William’s time is valuable, so I should make it clear that I’m thankful that he’s considering writing an Introduction. A good way to do that in addition to saying thanks is to give him a way to beg off without feeling too guilty.

Two additional rules for special scenarios are: 1) If we didn’t know each other well, I’d want to remind William how we met, and 2) If William does introduce Mike and I, I should follow up with an update and thanks.

Using these rules, here’s how my request for an Introduction reads:

Hi William,

I’m writing to ask if you’d be kind enough to introduce me to Mike (if, of course, you feel you know him well enough to do so). As you know, I’ve been toying with a new idea for widgets for genetics researchers. The prototype has been very well received by our initial user group; I think it has the potential to be a success, with the right stewardship.

It’s for that reason I want to connect with Mike. Being a well-known genomicist, Mike might be interested in the widget and, eventually, collaborating with me to go after a round of NSF funding. I hear there’s an upcoming “Dear Colleagues” letter that may be specifically related to genetics research widget design.

Thanks very much for taking the time to read this and considering my request. Feel free to decline if you don’t have the bandwidth to make the Introduction right now, I completely understand.

Best,
Stacy

One final note: keep your requests for introductions to “2nd degree connections”–that is, friends of friends–because your chances of getting a meaningful introduction to a stranger through a friend of a friend of a friend depends on too many variables to be successful.

3. “Cold call” people you want to get to know

This strategy is one of the most risky, but can also be rewarding if it helps you move beyond your existing network and break into new areas–especially important for those seeking jobs.

You can use LinkedIn messaging to send a short note to introduce yourself to and ask advice of individuals who have a job similar to the one you’re aiming for, or to get in touch with recruiters (if you’re looking for a job in industry). You might also consider writing messages to people you don’t know that have viewed your profile, if you think it’d have a payoff (i.e. a connection or, better yet, a lead on a job).

4. Boost your discoverability with the help of your network

eTqcpRL.png

Let’s be clear: Endorsements can be totally useless when not done right. In the past, I’ve been endorsed for “Library”. And I’ve seen Endorsements on others’ profiles for even more mundane things.

But Endorsements can be useful for academics, if done with care. The more people Endorse you for a skill or knowledge area (like “Grant writing”), the more you are associated with that skill by LinkedIn and search engines–thereby upping your appearance in search results, surfacing you to potential collaborators or future employers.

Here’s how to keep from getting Endorsed for something too vague to be useful. You can control what others are able to Endorse you for by editing the Skills & Endorsements section of your profile. Delete any skills that don’t apply or aren’t relevant. You can also reorder how those skills appear on your profile–helpful for breaking out of a loop where you are most often endorsed for the skills you’re most endorsed for.

 If you choose to Endorse others, be sure to only do so for people you know, and for skills you actually think they possess. Otherwise, it comes off as spammy.

5. Land at least one Recommendation

qHoBCtc.png

Recommendations can help you network passively using your profile. Having at least one Recommendation on your profile makes it clear what type of an employee or collaborator you are, which builds trust in your personal brand.

Asking others to write Recommendations for you doesn’t have to be awkward. Offer to write a Recommendation for them, and let them know you’d welcome a Recommendation in return. Just be sure to make it clear that reciprocation is by no means required.

When writing a Recommendation, make it clear how you know him or her. Did you serve as co-chairs for a professional society? Did she supervise you at your last job? Give specifics about what makes him or her a solid co-worker, and let the reader know what types of jobs you think she or he could excel at.

6. Let others know you’re here and ready to dance

Now it’s time to connect your LinkedIn presence to the rest of your professional life.

Make new LinkedIn Connections in your offline life by advertising that you are on the network. One way to do that is to create a memorable LinkedIn URL and include that URL on your business card. You can also put your custom URL or a LinkedIn badge prominently on your professional website or blog.

LinkedIn should be just one piece of your online identity. Academia.edu, Mendeley, and Impactstory all have functionalities that LinkedIn lacks; use those sites to host your publications, find new collaborators, and track impact metrics for your work.

7. Boost the signals and cut the noise from LinkedIn Notifications

LinkedIn’s Notification emails can be both a blessing and a curse.

Notifications about your Connections–which include information about their new jobs, promotions, and requests for Recommendations–can be a nice way to stay abreast of what your colleagues are up to, and a reminder to check-in with former coworkers to say hello.

However, all the Notifications can sometimes be too much. (Do you really need to know about your LinkedIn Connections’ work anniversaries?) You can reduce the “noise” if you are sure to only connect with people you know, and review your Communications settings to make sure you’re getting the types of email you’d prefer to see.

You’ll also want to pay close attention to what sort of Notifications you’re sending out. Job seekers especially should make sure their “Activity broadcasts” are set up correctly (go to Privacy & Settings > “Turn on/off your activity broadcasts”), so current employers don’t get emails letting them know you’re on the job hunt.

Are you ready to rumble?

By now, you’ve reconnected with coworkers and friends to build a meaningful network. And you’ve learned how to hack some of LinkedIn’s more annoying features–Endorsements and Notifications chief among them–to build your brand as a scientist, making new contacts and uncovering professional opportunities along the way.

Do you have other tips for networking using LinkedIn? Want to share a story about a time you triumphed–or failed–to make new Connections or get a Recommendation on the site? Leave them in the comments section below!

7 tips to supercharge your academic LinkedIn profile

Like 1.9 million other academics, you’ve got a LinkedIn profile. Along with the rest of us, you set it up to improve your visibility and to network with other researchers.

Well, we’ve got some bad news for you: your LinkedIn profile probably isn’t doing either of those things right now. Or at least, not very well.

The problem is that LinkedIn is built for businesspeople, not scientists; it’s tough to translate the traditional scholarly CV into the business-friendly format imposed by LinkedIn. So most scientists’ profiles are dull and lack focus on their most important accomplishments, and their networking attempts are limited to “friending” co-workers.

We’re going to fix that by giving you seven easy hacks to turn LinkedIn into a powerful tool for scholarly visibility and networking.  Today, we’ll help you supercharge your profile; then in our next post, we’ll show you how to leverage that profile to built a powerful professional network.

1: Bust down barriers to finding your profile

859Xevy.png

What good is a killer LinkedIn profile if no one can find it, or if your profile is so locked down they can only see your name?

 Your first job is to check your “public profile” settings (go to Privacy & Settings > Edit your public profile) to make sure people can see what you want them to.

What might others want to see? Your past experience, summary, and education, for starters; also include your best awards, patents, and publications. But don’t worry if you haven’t got the right content in place yet; we’ll fix that soon.

Next, double-check your settings by signing out of LinkedIn completely and searching for yourself on both LinkedIn and Google.

Are you findable now? Great, let’s move on.

2: Make your Headline into an ‘elevator pitch’

LinkedIn includes a short text blurb next to each person’s name in search results. They call this your “Headline,” and just like a newspaper headline, it’s meant to stimulate enough interest to make the reader want more.

Here are some keys to writing a great LinkedIn headline:

  1. Describe yourself with the right words: Brainstorm a few keywords that are relevant to the field you’re targeting. Spend a few minutes searching for others in your field, and borrowing from keywords found in their profiles and Headlines. For instance, check out Arianna C’s Headline: “Conceptual Modelling, Facilitation, Research Management, Research Networking and Matching”. Right away, the viewer knows what Arianna is an expert at. Your headline should do the same.

  2. Be succinct: Never use two words when one will do. (Hard for academics, I know. 🙂 ) Barbara K., who works in biotech, has a great Headline that follows this rule: “Microbiologist with R & D experience.”

  3. Show your expert status: What makes you the chemical engineer/genomics researcher/neuroscientist? Do you put in the most hours, score the biggest grants, or get the best instructor evaluations from students? This is your value proposition–what makes you great. Those with less experience like recent graduates can supplement this section by showing their passion for a topic. (I.e., “Computer scientist with a passion for undergraduate education.”)

  4. Use a tried and true formula to writing your headline: 3 keywords + 1 value proposition = Headline success, according to career coach Diana YK Chan. So what does that look like? Taking the keywords from (1) and value proposition from (3) above, we can create a Headline that reads, “Computer scientist with a passion for undergraduate education and experience in conceptual modelling and research management.” Cool, huh?

Well-written headlines are also key to making you more findable online–important for those of us who need to disambiguation from similarly-named researchers beyond ORCID.

3: Make yourself approachable with a photo

The next step to making yourself memorable to get a good photo on your profile. Here are three tips to remember:

r62Rflo.png

4: Hook ‘em with your Summary section

Now it’s time to encourage viewers of your profile to learn about you in more detail. That’s where the Summary section comes in.

Your Summary is an opportunity to provide a 50,000 foot view into your career and studies to date. Don’t just use this section to repeat information found elsewhere on your profile. Instead, write a short narrative of your professional life and career aspirations, using some of the keywords left over from writing your Headline. Here are three tips to help:

Be specific

Don’t use technical jargon, but do provide concrete details about your research and why it matters. Make yourself a person, not just another name in a discipline. Anthropologist Jason Baird Jackson does a great job of this:

“I have collaborated with Native American communities in Oklahoma since 1993, when I began a lifelong personal and research relationship with the Euchee/Yuchi people.”

Be up-front about what you want

Don’t beat around the bush when it comes to your professional goals. If you’ve done your job right, future employers, reviewers, students, and collaborators are probably reading your profile. Great. Now, what do you want to do with them? Let them know what you’re after, like scientist CW Hooker does in his Summary:

“I am always interested in discussing collaborations and future opportunities.”

Prove your value

Finally, use your Summary section to describe what you’ve done and why it matters. Elizabeth Iorns, breast cancer researcher and entrepreneur, explains to profile viewers that,

“Based on her own experiences as a young investigator seeking expert collaborations, Dr. Iorns co-founded Science Exchange. In 2012, after recognizing the need to create a positive incentive system that rewards independent validation of results, Dr. Iorns created the Reproducibility Initiative.”

 Right there is proof that she gets stuff done: she’s created solutions in response to service gaps for scientists. Impressive!

5: Give the scoop on your best work

If you’re a recent graduate or junior academic, it can be tempting to put all of your work experience on your LinkedIn profile.

Don’t do it!

Putting all of your positions on your profile can trivialize the more important work that you’ve done and make you look scattered.

Remember, your LinkedIn profile fills different role than your CV–it’s more of a trailer than a feature film. So include only the jobs that are relevant to your career goals. Mention a few specifics about your most important responsibilities and what you learned at those jobs, and save the gory details about your day-to-day work for your full CV.

A good rule for more senior researchers to talk mostly about your last 10-15 years of experience. Listing all of your past institutions will make for a monster profile that will turn readers off with too much detail.

After all, why would someone care if you were a lab assistant for Dr. Obscure at Wichita State University in 1985, when the more compelling story is that you’ve had your own lab since 2006?

6: Brag about your best awards and publications

Keeping it short and sweet also extends to discussing awards and publications on your LinkedIn profile. Highlight your best publications (especially those where you’re a lead author) and most prestigious awards (i.e., skip the $500 undergraduate scholarship from your local Elks club).

If you’re seeking an industry job, keep in mind that publications and awards don’t mean nearly as much outside of academia. In fact, you might want to leave those sections off of your LinkedIn profile altogether, replacing them with patents you’ve filed or projects you’ve led.

7. Add some eye-catching content

NsvQaut.png

If LinkedIn were designed for scientists, it’d be much easier to import information from our CVs. Too bad it’s not. Nonetheless, with a little ingenuity you can make the site great for showcasing what scientists have a lot of: posters, slide decks, and figures for manuscripts.

If you’ve ever given a talk at a conference, or submitted a figure with a manuscript for publication, you can upload it here, giving viewers a better taste of your work. Add links, photos, slideshows, and videos directly to your profile using the Upload icon on your profile’s Summary and Experience sections. Consider also adding a link to your Impactstory profile, so you can show readers your larger body of work and its popular and scholarly impact.

Want some inspiration? Neuroscientist Bradley Voytek has added a Wow Factor to his profile with a link to a TEDx talk he gave on his research. Pharmacology professor Ramy Aziz showcases his best conference talks using links to Slideshare slide decks. And Github repositories make an appearance alongside slide decks on PhD student Cristhian Parra’s profile (pictured above).

You too can upload links to your best–and most visually stimulating–work for a slick-looking profile that sets you apart from others.

If you’ve followed our steps to hacking LinkedIn’s limitations for scientists, that drab old profile is spiffed up and ready to share. Now you’re poised to make lasting connections with your colleagues via LinkedIn, and hook potential collaborators.

But! You haven’t even scratched the surface of LinkedIn’s value until you use it to network. We’ll show you how to do that in the second part of our series. Stay tuned!

Do you have tips for crafting great LinkedIn profiles, or what you–as an employer–look for in a LinkedIn profile? Leave them in the comments below!

Contest: Share your impact story and win a Free T-shirt!

IKmRSst.png

Two years ago, we asked you to share your pains with us. Your feedback enabled us to build a service that helps researchers learn about and share their own “impact stories” every day.

Since then, we’ve grown exponentially. Now, it’s a good time to hear your success stories.

How have you used your Impactstory data, and to what effect? What has Impactstory helped you discover about the reach of your work? How has Impactstory helped your career? 

Some examples of the stories we’ve heard and would love to hear more of include:

  • I used Impactstory to make my case for tenure–and I got it!

  • Impactstory data helped me figure out which of my research projects has “broader impacts,” and I used that information to get a grant!

  • I put Impactstory data on my CV during a job hunt, and got some compliments–and a job!

Knowing more about how you use Impactstory can help us plan which features to implement, and even help us imagine features we haven’t yet dreamed up!

How to participate

Send an email with your story in a paragraph or two to team@impactstory.org, or post it on our Facebook page.

The author of the best story will receive an Impactstory t-shirt of their choice. And everyone who participates will get their very own stash of Impactstory stickers!

The contest closes next Wednesday, April 23rd, at 12 pm EDT. A winner will be announced here on the Impactstory blog on Thursday, April 24th–stay tuned!

Announcing a better way to measure your value: the Total Impact Score

Measuring the full impact of a scholar’s work is important to us here at Impactstory. No single metric captures all the flavors of your impact–until now.

We’re announcing a thrilling new feature to be rolled out in the next few days: Total Impact Scores.* Now, using one metric to rule them all, you can capture and calculate not only your value as a Scholar, but your worth as a Human Being.

We are increasingly able to track your productivity, effectiveness, and health thanks to the Quantified Self movement. Smart appliances are able to tell us more than ever about your habits in the home.

By forging partnerships with new data providers, we’re able to get a fuller picture of your value on the job and in your private life. To help you make sense of all that data, we’re summarized your impact in the Total Impact Score.

While the exact algorithms we use to calculate your Total Impact Scores are proprietary, we can share with you some of the data streams that are taken into account when compiling your Total Impact Score:

We have also paid close attention to concerns about the over-dependence upon quantitative measures, and will soon roll out qualitative supplements to the Total Impact Score, including full-text reports on your effectiveness as a parent, spouse, co-worker, and friend–as reported by your loved ones and colleagues.

Stay tuned for future announcements about the Total-Impact Score and other innovations in altmetrics!

* Some might recognize the name–Total-Impact is what we called the first iteration of Impactstory. With our single impact metric, the Total Impact Score, you can truly calculate your total impact, beyond the Academy.

Come hangout with us this Thursday!

5QfWVlk.png

Are you curious about altmetrics? Want to learn more about Impactstory, the only non-profit company committed to helping you find all your research impact?

Follow us on Google+ and get your invitation to join Stacy at our official, one-hour Google Hangout this Thursday, March 27th at 2 pm EDT/11 am PDT.

Stay for a few minutes or the entire hour, it’s up to you! We just want to get to know you better and chat about our favorite topic, altmetrics.

Even if you can’t make it, follow Impactstory on Google+ to stay in the loop with our latest news and learn about future Hangouts!